
If you check out the Metro de Montreal site, you'll find a number of other proposals. Naturally the one I like the most is the one they propose for 2100, although I think its what we should have now. As they point out on that site, we may have the second-largest metro in North America, but by European standards our transit network is puny. Madrid added over 60km of lines last year, which is roughly the size of our whole network. Oh, BTW the bandwidth for that site is limited and the first few times I tried to go there I got a "bandwidth exceeded, try again later", which is why the image below, although taken from that site, is hosted locally.

April 28 2007, 23:22:29 UTC 5 years ago
Second largest?!?!?
What are you talking about? NYC claims to have 1000km of track. BART in San Fransisco has 160km or so, as does the Washington Metro. (Ok, my source for these is Wikipedia, but I don't think they're too far off base). Montreal's is TINY, it's smaller than Toronto's!April 29 2007, 00:40:42 UTC 5 years ago
Re: Second largest?!?!?
Sorry, my misread. It's CANADA'S second largest.April 29 2007, 00:48:20 UTC 5 years ago
Re: Second largest?!?!?
Ah, well then. It's a bit like saying that Denis Thatcher has the second most balls of anyone in England. No, wait, that's the second most balls of anyone in the Thatcher household. ;)